Remote Access Technologies for Library
Collections: Tools for Library Users and Managers. By Diane M.
Fulkerson. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2012. 213 pages. Hard
cover. ISBN 9781466602342.
The
growth of distance education has caused libraries to increasingly rely on
technology to provide services to users. This book addresses the many
technologies that allow users to remotely access library services. While not
clear from its title, it is intended primarily for use in an academic setting.
The
book is organized into twelve chapters, each addressing a topic of interest to
an academic audience. Subjects addressed include distance education and
assessing user needs, copyright, collection development, digital collections,
course management software, Web 2.0 tools, and mobile technology. Each chapter
includes the following sections: Introduction, Background, Main Focus of the
Chapter, Future Trends, and a Conclusion. One of the weaknesses of this book is
that it is overly repetitive. Much of the material in the “Main Focus of the
Chapter” sections is repeated in the “Future Trends” and conclusion of each
chapter.
However,
the book has many other significant weaknesses. It appears to have been published
without any editorial review. Grammatical errors, and missing and misplaced
punctuation appear in almost every paragraph and certainly on every page. The
writing is awkward and unprofessional. Many sentences are written in such a way
that they are completely incoherent. For example: “As for libraries and
libraries, it will help keep them an integral (and irreplaceable) part of
current and future research in academic and beyond” (p. 30). Another example:
“In order to meet the needs of users’ new approaches and ideas need to be
explored to meet the growing demands of library users” (p. 55). A third
example: “Librarians support access to information all people to help educate
all people” (p. 51).
In
addition, many of the stated “facts” are suspect. There are too many
generalizations such as “All libraries have collection development policies
regarding the materials they will include in their collections” (p. 49). While
it might be true that most libraries have collection development policies,
making such generalizations without corroborating evidence is misleading. Other
statements are clearly incorrect, such as: “The Library of Congress will have
to adapt and change copyright law to meet the growing use of mobile technology
and digital content. As we make our way through the 21st century,
the Library of Congress will need to expand their list of exceptions for use of
copyrighted materials in an academic settings” (p. 43). Congress, not the
Library of Congress, makes copyright law.
It
is shocking that Information Science Reference, an imprint of IGI Global, would
allow a book with so many, and such egregious, errors to be published at all.
It is almost as if not one person read the manuscript prior to publication.
This book is not recommended.
No comments:
Post a Comment